Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Yezhisai M's avatar

I've been really enjoying this series and this post is hands down the strongest yet. I especially love your framing of first-order product and second-order thinking, it's a great way to capture the systemic evolution of strategy as opposed to the more linear, milestone-driven nature of traditional short- and long-term goal setting.


One idea that could be an interesting follow-up is related to ethics and bias, perhaps as part of the system deconstruction section. Something like: “How do you ensure your AI product aligns with ethical standards and avoids unintended bias?” It could provide insight into how candidates consider the broader societal impact of the AI systems that they’re building.


Overall, I love how these questions push candidates to think beyond execution and into systems-level reasoning. Looking forward to your next set of posts in this series!

Expand full comment
Athens's avatar
1dEdited

Great thoughts!

1) Would you say Q1 and Q5 are similar, but Q1 is a fine-grained version? Also, for Q5, I'm thinking of how pitching "Renting out Bed and Breakfast for SF conferences" sounded like 20 years ago - fair example?

2) Also, broken link to Part 1 and Part 2 :P

http://link_to_part_1/ ....

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts